 | Your Junk my Happy Zone | |
| by Brandon Corbett |
Nick Snow recently started the discussion about "construct(ing) a way to give the hitters an edge;" meaning we use larger barreled bats. Many leagues around the nation do this: Palisades, Golden Stick, and Tampa Bay Wiffleball - whose season should be just about ready to start - are some of the best examples. These leagues all use the larger barrels to give their batters a better chance and even up the play in their leagues. Quite literally performance enhancing bats. These leagues also allow scuffing; each pitcher meticulously carving personalized patterns into their own balls that boost the performance of their pitches. Quid pro quo. Over time hitters would gain an advantage, so rules changed to help pitchers; then pitchers began to dominate, so rules were amended to benefit batters, and so on.
"Performance enhancing bats," or PEBs, are a huge deal in Wiffleball circles. Their use is routinely debated with each side remaining certain that their way is correct. The Wiffler's Digest Magazine featured them as the cover story of their debut issue. Is Ryan Winfield right in his assertions that PEB users shell out hundreds of dollars only to take a game meant for childlike enthusiasm and fill it with scowls, disparaging remarks, and stepping on other players to elevate their own status? Do the replies in the inbox of the Second Edition from D. Morse and R. Ewald (and to a much lesser extent B. Kind) make a good point that yellow bats are useless when trying to hit at the highest level of fast pitch? It is probably important to note at this point that the bottom-tier pitchers in Palisades or GSWL are on par with Dennis Pearson and Austin Bischoff.
One thing any fan or player of Wiffle will, hopefully, agree on is that a lopsided game is a bad game. If pitchers completely dominate, then the game ends up boring. If pitchers cannot get a batter out, the big blasts may be fun for a minute, but soon it becomes old hat and tiresome to watch. So, what constitutes a fairly matched, "good game?" Why not go straight to the top? The MLB.
After talking with Snow and Commissioner Coffee, I was interested to see where exactly the numbers fell for our league. A quick glance showed that in 2011 WSEM had 26 batters, out of the 66 in the league, hit over .300. Looking a little deeper at only "everyday players" (14+ games played), only four hit below .200, while twelve hit above .280. Those numbers seemed to show that our batters were not so dominated by the pitchers after all. Still, that evidence was not concrete enough to make a statement. So, I dug up league averages for the MLB on www.baseball-reference.com and put them alongside ours. How do you think we lined up against the league we all grew up emulating?
Take a look:
On the batters' side, it is a clean sweep for WSEM. We hit better than the big leagues in each stat category! Wait, that is not really the point. Still a fun fact to tell your friends, though. The point is: the MLB is considered to be baseball played at its highest (read: "best") level. If our hitters were at a severe disadvantage that threatened to ruin the quality of the game, then you would expect us to fall far short of the MLB numbers.
Average (AVG) is the most obvious stat to look at, and a +.023 difference shows that as a league we hit very comparably to the MLB. Also, 35 WSEM players (53%) hit above the MLB average of .255, while 31 (47%) hit below that mark. Just about a perfect spread. A marginal difference of +.035 in Slugging percentage (SLG) shows that extra base hits come at a similar rate in WSEM as they do in the MLB, as well. On base percentage (OBP) is slightly inflated due to the greater number of walks in Wiffleball than baseball, but those extra bases mean another plus for our hitters. Looking at the numbers I think it is safe to say that our batters are not playing at an unfair disadvantage - just being challenged at a competitive level.
What about that challenge? How do WSEM pitchers match up against their MLB counterparts?
Remarkably well. WSEM pitchers show the same pattern of closely comparable numbers with the MLB that our batters did. The -0.11 advantage in earned run average (ERA) for our pitchers is so close it is beautiful. It is the aforementioned increase in walks that pushes our WHIP behind The Bigs, in what is the largest margin of difference of the six categories at +.064. The increase in Wiffleball strike-outs, though, brings the strike-out to walk ratio (K/BB) down to another so-close-it-is-beautiful -0.13 difference.
That last sentence is where the perceived "hitter's disadvantage" stems from; specifically, the increase in Wiffleball strike-outs. I get it. I feel you. Striking out does not make you feel good. Maybe it makes you feel silly, or even pissed off. It should not. Everyone strikes out, even Mr. .567, Joey Delano. The key point here is that, even with the Ks, we are still reaching base at the same level seen in the Major Leagues. Remember why the Wiffleball was created: so a twelve year old could throw a curve ball.
In addition to pitching being the reason behind the game, WSEM will already be featuring two new rules on the field next year that will assist the offensive numbers. First, the pitching rotation will limit aces to at most 14 games pitched; unless they only throw two innings, in which case you have three innings to get hits off someone else. Second, runners can now tag up from any base, allowing you more opportunities to maneuver into scoring situations. With those two rules providing a bump to already good offensive numbers I cannot see any reason to tell teams they need to spend hundreds of dollars on equipment for having fun in the backyard or park. In fact, I do not even see a need to take lesser action, such as moving the mound back to 48'. One day WSEM will probably face with the need to balance out the game for our hitters, but we are not there yet.
One thing any fan or player of Wiffle will, hopefully, agree on is that a lopsided game is a bad game. If pitchers completely dominate, then the game ends up boring. If pitchers cannot get a batter out, the big blasts may be fun for a minute, but soon it becomes old hat and tiresome to watch. So, what constitutes a fairly matched, "good game?" Why not go straight to the top? The MLB.
After talking with Snow and Commissioner Coffee, I was interested to see where exactly the numbers fell for our league. A quick glance showed that in 2011 WSEM had 26 batters, out of the 66 in the league, hit over .300. Looking a little deeper at only "everyday players" (14+ games played), only four hit below .200, while twelve hit above .280. Those numbers seemed to show that our batters were not so dominated by the pitchers after all. Still, that evidence was not concrete enough to make a statement. So, I dug up league averages for the MLB on www.baseball-reference.com and put them alongside ours. How do you think we lined up against the league we all grew up emulating?
Take a look:
On the batters' side, it is a clean sweep for WSEM. We hit better than the big leagues in each stat category! Wait, that is not really the point. Still a fun fact to tell your friends, though. The point is: the MLB is considered to be baseball played at its highest (read: "best") level. If our hitters were at a severe disadvantage that threatened to ruin the quality of the game, then you would expect us to fall far short of the MLB numbers.
Average (AVG) is the most obvious stat to look at, and a +.023 difference shows that as a league we hit very comparably to the MLB. Also, 35 WSEM players (53%) hit above the MLB average of .255, while 31 (47%) hit below that mark. Just about a perfect spread. A marginal difference of +.035 in Slugging percentage (SLG) shows that extra base hits come at a similar rate in WSEM as they do in the MLB, as well. On base percentage (OBP) is slightly inflated due to the greater number of walks in Wiffleball than baseball, but those extra bases mean another plus for our hitters. Looking at the numbers I think it is safe to say that our batters are not playing at an unfair disadvantage - just being challenged at a competitive level.
What about that challenge? How do WSEM pitchers match up against their MLB counterparts?
Remarkably well. WSEM pitchers show the same pattern of closely comparable numbers with the MLB that our batters did. The -0.11 advantage in earned run average (ERA) for our pitchers is so close it is beautiful. It is the aforementioned increase in walks that pushes our WHIP behind The Bigs, in what is the largest margin of difference of the six categories at +.064. The increase in Wiffleball strike-outs, though, brings the strike-out to walk ratio (K/BB) down to another so-close-it-is-beautiful -0.13 difference.
That last sentence is where the perceived "hitter's disadvantage" stems from; specifically, the increase in Wiffleball strike-outs. I get it. I feel you. Striking out does not make you feel good. Maybe it makes you feel silly, or even pissed off. It should not. Everyone strikes out, even Mr. .567, Joey Delano. The key point here is that, even with the Ks, we are still reaching base at the same level seen in the Major Leagues. Remember why the Wiffleball was created: so a twelve year old could throw a curve ball.
In addition to pitching being the reason behind the game, WSEM will already be featuring two new rules on the field next year that will assist the offensive numbers. First, the pitching rotation will limit aces to at most 14 games pitched; unless they only throw two innings, in which case you have three innings to get hits off someone else. Second, runners can now tag up from any base, allowing you more opportunities to maneuver into scoring situations. With those two rules providing a bump to already good offensive numbers I cannot see any reason to tell teams they need to spend hundreds of dollars on equipment for having fun in the backyard or park. In fact, I do not even see a need to take lesser action, such as moving the mound back to 48'. One day WSEM will probably face with the need to balance out the game for our hitters, but we are not there yet.
-
Brandon Corbett
Flying Squirrels - 17
Media Director, Research ANALyst
Brandon Corbett
Flying Squirrels - 17
Media Director, Research ANALyst
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please, sign your name to your comments.